Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009890›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2025

Clinical effects of teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Kosuke Ebina, Yuki Etani, Takaaki Noguchi, Ken Nakata, Seiji Okada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kosuke EbinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. k-ebina@ort.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-1024
Yuki EtaniDepartment of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5741-5969
Takaaki NoguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-6780
Ken NakataDepartment of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-4229
Seiji OkadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-8209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the management of osteoporosis, anti-resorptive agents serve as a primary therapeutic approach. However, in cases where individuals exhibit an increased susceptibility to fractures, such as those characterized by severe low bone mass or a history of vertebral or hip fractures that markedly diminish life expectancy, the immediate reduction of fracture risk through the administration of osteoanabolic agents could be beneficial. Teriparatide, available in daily, once-weekly, or twice-weekly dosages, along with abaloparatide and romosozumab, constitutes a trio of such agents. Each of these medications is defined by unique characteristics, distinct efficacy profiles, and specific adverse effects. There is growing evidence to suggest that these agents have a superior effect on enhancing bone mineral density and reducing fracture incidence when compared to traditional bisphosphonate therapies. Nonetheless, their employment demands thorough consideration of clinical indications, which includes evaluating economic factors, the frequency of injections required, and the potential for adverse effects. The objective of this review is to consolidate the current evidence focusing primarily on the efficacy of these agents, with the goal of enhancing understanding and aiding in making more informed treatment decisions, particularly for those individuals who are at an elevated risk of fractures.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalParathyroid Hormone-Related ProteinTeriparatideBone DensityFemaleHumansabaloparatideAntibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsParathyroid Hormone-Related ProteinromosozumabTeriparatideAbaloparatideOsteoanabolic agentPostmenopausal osteoporosisRomosozumabTeriparatide

Identifiers

PMID39009890
PMCPMC11954689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.