ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Multidisciplinary Experience for Gluteal Fat Grafting.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Safety and Outcomes in Brazilian Butt Lift: Mobile Ultrasound With Artificial Intelligence.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- #BrazilianButtLift: The Reel Problem Regarding Gluteal Augmentation Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGluteal fat grafting, colloquially known as Brazilian Butt Lift, has experienced a significant rise in popularity in recent years. Despite this increase, potential complications associated with the procedure have also been observed, necessitating a thorough examination of the current practices and outcomes.
methodsThis study collected experiences of a multidisciplinary group of surgeons through a detailed survey sent in April 2022. This study aimed to shed light on the practices employed by these surgeons, the frequency and types of complications they encounter, and the overall outcomes of their procedures.
resultsOf the 100 surgeons surveyed, 86 responded. The study identified that pulmonary fat embolism (PFE) was the most serious complication, with fatality due to PFE recorded at a rate of 1:23,878. Liposuction site seromas were the most common complications, with an overall rate of 2.45%. Although there were no overall differences in complications between plastic and non-plastic surgeons, plastic surgeons were found to have a sixfold increase in the odds of experiencing a liposuction seroma. The survey also revealed substantial practice variations, particularly regarding fat preparation methods, recipient-site preparation, antibiotic use, and postoperative care protocols.
conclusionDespite known complications, a strong tendency to continue performing these procedures was observed among surgeons, demonstrating the sustained demand and acceptance of the procedure. This study underscores the need for continued surveillance and research to enhance the safety and effectiveness of gluteal fat grafts. The experiences and data gathered from practicing surgeons provide valuable insights, paving the way for refining techniques, building consensus, and facilitating informed discussions with patients about the risks and benefits of the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39009870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.