Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009861›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2024

An Insight Into Risk Assessment and Reformulation of Drug Products Manufactured Using Benzene Grade Carbomer: A Regulatory Perspective.

Kailash Bansal, Anil B Jindal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kailash BansalDepartment of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani Campus, Pilani, 333031, Rajasthan, India.
Anil B JindalDepartment of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani Campus, Pilani, 333031, Rajasthan, India. anil.jindal@pilani.bits-pilani.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3856-869X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer has been an enormous pain point for patients and regulatory bodies across the globe. In Dec. 2023, the US FDA released guidance on benzene-grade carbomer formulations, which triggered pharmaceutical manufacturers to assess risk, test finished products, and reformulate drug products with benzene-grade carbomer. The immediate implementation of the stoppage of finished products with benzene-grade carbomers has threatened pharmaceutical excipients and finished product manufacturers. The gravity of this situation prompted the US Pharmacopeia to extend the deadline for discontinuation from August 1, 2025, to August 1, 2026, allowing manufacturers ample time for reformulation and regulatory compliance.There is an immediate need to understand the guidance and to learn how manufacturers should do the risk assessment and approach reformulation. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the risk assessment and reformulation processes involved in various dosage forms utilizing benzene-grade carbomer, supported by specific case studies.This review offers insights into navigating the USFDA guidelines to ensure formulation safety and compliance, thus enabling pharmaceutical practitioners to uphold the highest standards of patient care and tackle life cycle management challenges.The decision of the USFDA to restrict the usage of high benzene content of carbomer in the formulation is a welcome move. This article has shown a way for researchers to see opportunities in the path and provide best-in-class medicines to patients with a better formulation safety profile.

Indexed as

BenzeneUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAcrylic ResinsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CompoundingDrug IndustryExcipientsHumansRisk AssessmentUnited StatesAcrylic ResinsBenzeneExcipientsbenzenecancercarbomerreformulationrisk assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.