Trial reportNature medicine2024
Outpatient reception via collaboration between nurses and a large language model: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI chatbots versus human healthcare professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of empathy in patient care.British medical bulletin · 2025Pooled it
- The Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Anatomy: A Systematic Review.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Pooled it
- Large language models in real-world clinical workflows: a systematic review of applications and implementation.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- An LLM chatbot to facilitate primary-to-specialist care transitions: a randomized controlled trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Performance of large language models in the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examinations and Beyond: Scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics should be built with surgeons, not just for them!Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- LungGPT: A unified multimodal system for interpretable diagnosis and clinical decision support of respiratory diseases.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Generative large language models in medicine: a scoping review of recent methodological advances.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Outcomes, Evaluation Metrics, and Measurement Tools for Large Language Model Applications Research in Nursing: A Scoping Review.International nursing review · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a large language model-based, retrieval-augmented generation application for query response in early oncology clinical trials.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Applying Large Language Models in Perioperative Medicine With an Equity-Informed Perspective.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2026Article
- Evidence, use cases, and implementation safeguards of large language models in primary care.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Large Language Models in Health Care Communication: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Clinical large language model centered on electronic medical records.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- AI chatbots for health information seeking among Chinese patients with precancerous ENT lesions: a descriptive qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Multimodal Wearable Biosensing Meets Multidomain AI: A Pathway to Decentralized Healthcare.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary expert evaluation of large language models on questions regarding bariatric surgery: a comparative analysis of ERNIE Bot 4.0, ChatGPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini Pro.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advantages and challenges for utilization of generative artificial intelligence in clinical nursing practice: an integrative review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- DermaGPT a federated multimodal framework with a meta learned trust function for interpretable dermatology diagnostics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reception is an essential process for patients seeking medical care and a critical component influencing the healthcare experience. However, current communication systems rely mainly on human efforts, which are both labor and knowledge intensive. A promising alternative is to leverage the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to assist the communication in medical center reception sites. Here we curated a unique dataset comprising 35,418 cases of real-world conversation audio corpus between outpatients and receptionist nurses from 10 reception sites across two medical centers, to develop a site-specific prompt engineering chatbot (SSPEC). The SSPEC efficiently resolved patient queries, with a higher proportion of queries addressed in fewer rounds of queries and responses (Q&Rs; 68.0% ≤2 rounds) compared with nurse-led sessions (50.5% ≤2 rounds) (P = 0.009) across administrative, triaging and primary care concerns. We then established a nurse-SSPEC collaboration model, overseeing the uncertainties encountered during the real-world deployment. In a single-center randomized controlled trial involving 2,164 participants, the primary endpoint indicated that the nurse-SSPEC collaboration model received higher satisfaction feedback from patients (3.91 ± 0.90 versus 3.39 ± 1.15 in the nurse group, P < 0.001). Key secondary outcomes indicated reduced rate of repeated Q&R (3.2% versus 14.4% in the nurse group, P < 0.001) and reduced negative emotions during visits (2.4% versus 7.8% in the nurse group, P < 0.001) and enhanced response quality in terms of integrity (4.37 ± 0.95 versus 3.42 ± 1.22 in the nurse group, P < 0.001), empathy (4.14 ± 0.98 versus 3.27 ± 1.22 in the nurse group, P < 0.001) and readability (3.86 ± 0.95 versus 3.71 ± 1.07 in the nurse group, P = 0.006). Overall, our study supports the feasibility of integrating LLMs into the daily hospital workflow and introduces a paradigm for improving communication that benefits both patients and nurses. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2300077245 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39009780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.