Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2024
Transverse versus longitudinal mucosal incision during POEM for esophageal motility disorders: a randomized trial.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of prehabilitative gastrostomy tube feeding to bridge severely malnourished surgically unfit achalasia patients to per-oral endoscopic myotomy.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Anterior versus posterior peroral endoscopic myotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial from a Thai tertiary center.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A Modified Mucosal Incision for Easy Entry Into the Submucosal Space During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLongitudinal incision is the commonly used incision for entry into the submucosal space during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal motility disorders. Transverse incision is another alternative for entry and retrospective data suggest it has less operative time and chance of gas-related events.
methodsThis was a single-center, randomized trial conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Patients undergoing POEM for esophageal motility disorders were randomized into group A (longitudinal incision) and group B (transverse incision). The primary objective was to compare the time needed for entry into the submucosal space. The secondary objectives were to compare the time needed to close the incision, number of clips required to close the incision, and development of gas-related events. The sample size was calculated as for a non-inferiority design using Kelsey method.
resultsSixty patients were randomized (30 in each group). On comparing the 2 types of incisions, there was no difference in entry time [3 (2, 5) vs 2 (1.75, 5) min, p = 0.399], closure time [7 (4, 13.5) vs 9 (6.75, 19) min, p = 0.155], and number of clips needed for closure [4 (4, 6) vs 5 (4, 7), p = 0.156]. Additionally, the gas-related events were comparable between the 2 groups (capnoperitoneum needing aspiration-5 vs 2, p = 0.228, and development of subcutaneous emphysema-3 vs 1, p = 0.301).
conclusionThis randomized trial shows comparable entry time, closure time, number of clips needed to close the incision, and gas-related events between longitudinal and transverse incisions. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2021/08/035829.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39009726What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.