Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009682›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

An efficient learning based approach for automatic record deduplication with benchmark datasets.

M Ravikanth, Sampath Korra, Gowtham Mamidisetti, Maganti Goutham, T Bhaskar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Ravikanth *Department of CSE, Malla Reddy University, Maisammaguda, Kompally, Hyderabad, India. drravikanthm.cse@mallareddyuniversity.ac.in.
Sampath Korra *Department of CSE, Sri Indu College of Engineering and Technology (A), Sheriguda, Ibrahimpatnam, Hyderabad, T.S, 501510, India.
Gowtham Mamidisetti *Department of CSE, Malla Reddy University, Maisammaguda, Kompally, Hyderabad, 500100, India.
Maganti Goutham *Department of CSE, Malla Reddy University, Maisammaguda, Kompally, Hyderabad, 500100, India.
T Bhaskar *Department of CSE CMR College of Engineering and Technology, Kandlakoya, Medchal, Hyderabad, TS, 50140, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With technological innovations, enterprises in the real world are managing every iota of data as it can be mined to derive business intelligence (BI). However, when data comes from multiple sources, it may result in duplicate records. As data is given paramount importance, it is also significant to eliminate duplicate entities towards data integration, performance and resource optimization. To realize reliable systems for record deduplication, late, deep learning could offer exciting provisions with a learning-based approach. Deep ER is one of the deep learning-based methods used recently for dealing with the elimination of duplicates in structured data. Using it as a reference model, in this paper, we propose a framework known as Enhanced Deep Learning-based Record Deduplication (EDL-RD) for improving performance further. Towards this end, we exploited a variant of Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) along with various attribute compositions, similarity metrics, and numerical and null value resolution. We proposed an algorithm known as Efficient Learning based Record Deduplication (ELbRD). The algorithm extends the reference model with the aforementioned enhancements. An empirical study has revealed that the proposed framework with extensions outperforms existing methods.

Indexed as

Data integrationDeep learningLong short term memoryRecord deduplicationWord embeddings

Identifiers

PMID39009682
PMCPMC11251143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.