Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009618›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Fabrication, characterization and numerical validation of a novel thin-wall hydrogel vessel model for cardiovascular research based on a patient-specific stenotic carotid artery bifurcation.

Ashkan Shiravand, Kevin Richter, Pia Willmann, Pepe Eulzer, Kai Lawonn, Anna Hundertmark, Giorgio Cattaneo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development and Characteristics of a Dual-Layered Vascular Phantom.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026
    Article
  4. Hemodynamics in carotid artery stenosis.International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashkan ShiravandInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. ashkan.shiravand@bmt.uni-stuttgart.de.
Kevin RichterFaculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Pia WillmannInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Pepe EulzerFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Kai LawonnFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Anna HundertmarkFaculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Giorgio CattaneoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) joint project 05M2020-MLgSA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro vascular models, primarily made of silicone, have been utilized for decades for studying hemodynamics and supporting the development of implants for catheter-based treatments of diseases such as stenoses and aneurysms. Hydrogels have emerged as prominent materials in tissue-engineering applications, offering distinct advantages over silicone models for fabricating vascular models owing to their viscoelasticity, low friction, and tunable mechanical properties. Our study evaluated the feasibility of fabricating thin-wall, anatomical vessel models made of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel (PVA-H) based on a patient-specific carotid artery bifurcation using a combination of 3D printing and molding technologies. The model's geometry, elastic modulus, volumetric compliance, and diameter distensibility were characterized experimentally and numerically simulated. Moreover, a comparison with silicone models with the same anatomy was performed. A PVA-H vessel model was integrated into a mock circulatory loop for a preliminary ultrasound-based assessment of fluid dynamics. The vascular model's geometry was successfully replicated, and the elastic moduli amounted to 0.31 ± 0.007 MPa and 0.29 ± 0.007 MPa for PVA-H and silicone, respectively. Both materials exhibited nearly identical volumetric compliance (0.346 and 0.342% mmHg

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisHydrogelsModels, CardiovascularPolyvinyl AlcoholCarotid ArteriesElastic ModulusHemodynamicsHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringHydrogelsPolyvinyl Alcoholpolyvinyl alcohol hydrogelCardiovascular engineeringFluid dynamicsFluid–structure interaction (FSI)HydrogelIn vitroNumerical simulationUltrasoundVessel complianceVessel model

Identifiers

PMID39009618
PMCPMC11251049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.