Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009608›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Putting ICAP to the test: how technology-enhanced learning activities are related to cognitive and affective-motivational learning outcomes in higher education.

Christina Wekerle, Martin Daumiller, Stefan Janke, Oliver Dickhäuser, Markus Dresel, Ingo Kollar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina Wekerle *University of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 10, 86135, Augsburg, Germany. christina.wekerle@phil.uni-augsburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4622-999X
Martin Daumiller *University of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 10, 86135, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0261-6143
Stefan JankeUniversity of Mannheim, A 5, 6, 68159, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1799-8850
Oliver DickhäuserUniversity of Mannheim, A 5, 6, 68159, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3126-8398
Markus DreselUniversity of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 10, 86135, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-3749
Ingo KollarUniversity of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 10, 86135, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9257-5028

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DA 2392/2-3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DI 929/5-3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DR 454/8-3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) JA 3137/2-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technology is considered to have great potential to promote learning in higher education. In line with the Interactive, Constructive, Active, Passive (ICAP) framework, this seems to be particularly true when instructors stimulate high-quality learning activities such as constructive and interactive learning activities instead of active and passive learning activities. Against the background of a lack of empirical studies in authentic, technology-enhanced instructional settings, we investigated the cognitive and affective-motivational effects of these learning activity modes in technology-enhanced higher education courses. To this end, we used 3.820 student assessments regarding 170 course sessions for which the teachers stated the learning activities students were engaged in. Results of multilevel structural equation modelling highlight the importance of technology-enhanced interactive learning activities for students' perception of learning and the potential negative consequences of passive learning activities for affective-motivational outcomes. However, the superiority of constructive and interactive learning activities compared to passive and active learning activities for cognitive and affective-motivational outcomes was not supported by the findings. Instead, the findings point to potential differential effects of the individual learning activities within one activity mode. Future research should follow up on these effects to gain a more fine-grained understanding of how technology-enhanced learning activities can be optimized to enhance students' learning outcomes.

Indexed as

CognitionLearningMotivationStudentsAdultAffectDigital TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleProblem-Based LearningYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39009608
PMCPMC11250844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.