Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009596›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the livestock, humans and environmental samples around the globe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Barbra Tuhamize, Joel Bazira

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Carbapenem-resistantPublic health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Detection of blaJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barbra Tuhamize *Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda. btuhamize@must.ac.ug.
Joel Bazira *Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have diminished treatment options causing serious morbidities and mortalities. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the prevalence and associated factors of Enterobacteriaceae infections in clinical, livestock and environmental settings globally. The population intervention comparison and outcome strategy was used to enroll studies using the preferred reporting system for systematic review and meta-analysis to include only cross-sectional studies. Search engines used to retrieve articles included journal author name estimator, PubMed, Google Scholar and African Journals Online (AJOL). The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of studies. Sixteen articles from 2013 to 2023 in Africa, Asia, Europe and South America were studied. The pooled prevalence of CRE was 43.06% (95% CI 21.57-66.03). Klebsiella pneumoniae (49.40%), Escherichia coli (26.42%), and Enterobacter cloacae (14.24%) were predominant. Klebsiella pneumoniae had the highest resistance with the blaKPC-2 in addition to blaNDM, blaOXA-48, blaIMP and blaVIM. The blaKPC-2 genes occurrence was associated with environmental (P-value < 0.0001) and South American studies (P-value < 0.0001), but there was no difference in the trends over time (P-value = 0.745). This study highlights the high rates of CRE infections, particularly within blaKPC production. Monitoring and surveillance programs, research and infection control measures should be strengthened. Additionally, further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms driving the predominance of specific bacterial species and the distribution of resistance genes within this bacterial family.

Indexed as

Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsLivestockAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaePrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCarbapenem-resistanceEnterobacteriaceaeResistance genes

Identifiers

PMID39009596
PMCPMC11251140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.