Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009425›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2024

Tailored leadership training in emergency medicine: qualitative exploration of the impact of the EMLeaders programme on consultants and trainees in England.

Rosie Kneafsey, Amanda Moore, Shea Palmer, Ala Szczepura, Gareth Hooper, Caroline Leech, Chris Turner, Aanika Khan, Bhupinder Pawar, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Management and leadership competencies in Emergency Medicine specialist training: a review with implications for African programmes.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Review
  2. A qualitative study exploring how an Emergency Medicine leadership programme was received in Ghana.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rosie KneafseyResearch Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK aa9398@coventry.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6613-5296
Amanda MooreDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Shea PalmerSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-3264
Ala SzczepuraResearch Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Gareth HooperResearch Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Caroline LeechEmergency Department, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5301-9798
Chris TurnerEmergency Department, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Aanika KhanRoyal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, London, UK.
Bhupinder PawarSchool of Health, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Amanda Rodrigues Amorim AdegboyeResearch Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency medicine (EM) consultants are expected to provide leadership to facilitate optimal clinical results, effective teamwork and learning. To foster leadership skills, the Emergency Medicine Leadership Programme (EMLeaders) was launched in 2018 by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), Health Education England and National Health Service England. A mixed-methods evaluation of EMLeaders was commissioned to assess the impact at the strategic, team and individual levels. This paper reports the qualitative evaluation component.

methodsQualitative data collected from 2021 to 2022 were drawn from an online survey of RCEM members in England, which included four open questions about leadership training. At the end of the survey, participants were asked to share contact details if willing to undertake an in-depth qualitative interview. Interviews explored perceptions of the programme and impact of curriculum design and delivery. Data were analysed thematically against the Kirkpatrick framework, providing in-depth understanding.

resultsThere were 417 survey respondents, of whom 177 had participated in EMLeaders. Semistructured interviews were completed with 13 EM consultants, 13 trainees and 1 specialty and associate specialist doctor. EMLeaders was highly valued by EM consultants and trainees, particularly group interaction, expert facilitation and face-to-face practical scenario work. Consultant data yielded the themes: we believe in it; EM relevance is key; on a leadership journey; shaping better leaders; and a broken system. Challenges were identified in building engagement within a pressured workplace system and embedding workplace role modelling. Trainees identified behavioural shift in themselves following the programme but wanted more face-to-face discussions with senior colleagues. Key trainee themes included value in being together, storytelling in leadership, headspace for the leadership lens and survival in a state of collapse.

conclusionThe development of leadership skills in EM is considered important. The EMLeaders programme can support leadership learning but further embedding is needed.

Indexed as

ConsultantsEmergency MedicineLeadershipQualitative ResearchAdultCurriculumEnglandFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSurveys and Questionnaireseducationmanagementqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39009425
PMCPMC11347192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.