ArticleLife science alliance2024
Article in Life science alliance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying Embryonic Lethality Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Article
- SIN-3 coregulator maintains adaptive capacity to different diets in Caenorhabditis elegans through vitamin B12.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Shared urinary metabolomic signatures as potential biomarkers for early intestinalCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In humans, a neomorphic isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.