Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009375›Full record

ArticleIntestinal research2024

Long-term efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis: 3-year results from a real-world study.

Hiromichi Shimizu, Yuko Aonuma, Shuji Hibiya, Ami Kawamoto, Kento Takenaka, Toshimitsu Fujii, Eiko Saito, Masakazu Nagahori, Kazuo Ohtsuka, Ryuichi Okamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intestinal research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Endo-histologic outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis responding to tofacitinib.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hiromichi ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko AonumaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan.
Shuji HibiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ami KawamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kento TakenakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshimitsu FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiko SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masakazu NagahoriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuo OhtsukaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuichi OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Although, a series of reports with real-world evidence of its short-term efficacy and safety profiles have already been published, reports of long-term real-world data have been limited. We aimed to show our 3-year evidence on the clinical use of tofacitinib for the treatment of UC, focusing on its efficacy and safety profiles.

methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who started tofacitinib for active refractory UC at our hospital. The primary outcome was the retention rate until 156 weeks after initiating tofacitinib. The secondary outcomes were short-term efficacy at 4, 8, and 12 weeks; long-term efficacy at 52, 104, and 156 weeks; prognostic factors related to the cumulative retention rate; loss of response; and safety profile, including adverse events.

resultsForty-six patients who were able to be monitored for up to 156 weeks after tofacitinib initiation, were enrolled in this study. Continuation of tofacitinib was possible until 156 weeks in 54.3%, with > 50% response rates and > 40% remission rates. Among patients in whom response or remission was achieved and tofacitinib was deescalated after 8 weeks of induction treatment, 54.3% experienced relapse but were successfully rescued by and retained on reinduction treatment, except for 1 patient. No serious AEs were observed in the study.

conclusionsTofacitinib is effective and safe as long-term treatment in a refractory cohort of UC patients in real-world clinical practice.

Indexed as

EfficacyReal-world evidenceSafetyTofacitinibUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID39009375
PMCPMC11309816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.