Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009183›Full record

SynthesisJournal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus2024

Spontaneous recovery from amblyopia following fellow eye vision loss: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Madison P Echavarri-Leet, Hannah H Resnick, Daniel A Bowen, Deborah Goss, Mark F Bear, Eric D Gaier

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madison P Echavarri-LeetPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Hannah H ResnickDepartment of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel A BowenPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deborah GossHowe Library, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark F BearPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Eric D GaierPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: eric.gaier@childrens.harvard.edu.

Funding

Using the principles of synaptic plasticity to promote recovery from amblyopiaR01EY029245 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BEAR, MARK F · 2018 to 2021
$2.4M
Exploiting principles of timing-dependent synaptic plasticity to treat amblyopiaK08EY030164 · NEI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI GAIER, ERIC DEAN · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
Elucidating the Role of Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Burst-Mode Firing in Retinal Inactivation Induced Recovery from Monocular DeprivationF31EY033996 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LEET, MADISON · 2022 to 2024
$143k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY033996NEI NIH HHS K08 EY030164NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of traditional amblyopia therapies is largely restricted to childhood. However, spontaneous recovery in adulthood is possible following vision loss in the fellow eye due to enucleation, injury, or disease. The twofold purpose of this study was (1) to define the incidence of recovery and (2) to elucidate the clinical features associated with greater amblyopic eye gains.

methodsA systematic review of three databases yielded 24 reports containing 110 cases of patients ≥18 years old with unilateral amblyopia and vision-limiting fellow eye pathology.

resultsOur analysis revealed that 25 of 42 of adult patients (59.5%) gained ≥2 logMAR lines in the amblyopic eye after fellow eye vision loss. The degree of improvement is clinically meaningful (median, 2.6 logMAR lines). Recovery occurs within 12 months of initial loss of fellow eye vision. Regression analysis demonstrated that younger age, worse baseline visual acuity in the amblyopic eye, and worse vision in the fellow eye independently conferred greater gains in amblyopic eye visual acuity. Recovery occurs across amblyopia types and fellow eye pathologies, although disease entities affecting fellow eye retinal ganglion cells demonstrate shorter latencies to recovery.

conclusionsAmblyopia recovery after fellow eye injury demonstrates that the adult brain harbors the neuroplastic capacity for clinically meaningful recovery, which could potentially be harnessed by novel approaches to treat adults with amblyopia.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaRecovery of FunctionRemission, SpontaneousVisual AcuityHumans

Identifiers

PMID39009183
PMCPMC11323063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.