ArticleIndian heart journal
Results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India.
Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiogenetics: Closing the knowledge gap in India.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalArticle
- India-specific cardiogenetic aspects: Focus on cardiomyopathies and inherited arrhythmia syndromes.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to analyze the results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a dedicated multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India.
methodsAll patients presenting to our clinic from August 2017 to October 2023 with a suspected inherited heart disease and consenting for genetic testing were included. The probands were grouped into familial cardiomyopathies namely hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) and peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), channelopathies namely congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS), and heritable connective tissue disorder namely Marfan Syndrome (MFS). Next generation sequencing (NGS) was used, and pre-test and post-test counseling were provided to probands and cascade screening offered to relatives.
resultsMean age of the subjects (n = 77; 48 probands, 29 relatives) was 43 ± 18 years, 68 % male and 44 % symptomatic, with 36 HCM, 3 DCM, 3 ACM, 1 PPCM, 3 LQTS, 1 BrS and 1 MFS probands. The diagnostic yield of NGS-based genetic testing was 31 %; variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were identified in 54 %; and 15 % were genotype-negative. Twenty-nine relatives from 18 families with HCM (n = 12), DCM (n = 3), ACM (n = 2) and MFS (n = 1) underwent genetic testing. The genotype positive probands/relatives and VUS carriers with strong disease phenotype and/or high risk variant were advised periodic follow-up; the remaining probands/relatives were discharged from further clinical surveillance.
conclusionsGenetic testing guides treatment and follow-up of patients with inherited heart diseases and should be carried out in dedicated multidisciplinary clinics with expertise for counseling and cascade screening of family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.