Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39008858›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of internal medicine2024

Mammography Screening Preferences Among Screening-Eligible Women in Their 40s : A National U.S. Survey.

Laura D Scherer, Carmen L Lewis, Kirsten McCaffery, Jolyn Hersch, Joseph N Cappella, Channing Tate, Brad Morse, Kelly Arnett, Bridget Mosley, Heather L Smyth and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05376241 (Understanding Affective Processing of Scientific Evidence to Promote Informed Choice for Breast Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05376241 phase2completednot on this map

Understanding Affective Processing of Scientific Evidence to Promote Informed Choice for Breast Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2022 to 2022Enrolled637ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDecision aid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Skeptical reactions to breast cancer screening benefits and harms: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for screening communication.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura D SchererSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, and Denver VA Center of Innovation, Aurora, Colorado (L.D.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-8660-7115
Carmen L LewisSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (C.L.L., C.T., B.Morse, K.A., B.Mosley, H.L.S.).
Kirsten McCafferySchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (K.M., J.H.).ORCID 0000-0003-2696-5006
Jolyn HerschSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (K.M., J.H.).ORCID 0000-0001-5225-6639
Joseph N CappellaAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.N.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-1998-4826
Channing TateSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (C.L.L., C.T., B.Morse, K.A., B.Mosley, H.L.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-6635-9794
Brad MorseSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (C.L.L., C.T., B.Morse, K.A., B.Mosley, H.L.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-1080-3961
Kelly ArnettSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (C.L.L., C.T., B.Morse, K.A., B.Mosley, H.L.S.).
Bridget MosleySchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (C.L.L., C.T., B.Morse, K.A., B.Mosley, H.L.S.).
Heather L SmythSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (C.L.L., C.T., B.Morse, K.A., B.Mosley, H.L.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-7865-4096
Marilyn M SchapiraPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, and Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (M.M.S.).

Funding

Understanding affective processing of scientific evidence to promote informed choice for breast cancer screeningR37CA254926 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Laura D. Scherer · 2021 to 2026
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA254926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently changed its recommendation for mammography screening from informed decision making to biennial screening for women aged 40 to 49 years. Although many women welcome this change, some may prefer not to be screened at age 40 years.

objectiveTo conduct a national probability-based U.S. survey to investigate breast cancer screening preferences among women aged 39 to 49 years.

designPre-post survey with a breast cancer screening decision aid (DA) intervention. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05376241).

settingOnline national U.S. survey.

participants495 women aged 39 to 49 years without a history of breast cancer or a known BRCA1/2 gene mutation.

interventionA mammography screening DA providing information about screening benefits and harms and a personalized breast cancer risk estimate. MEASUREMENTS: Screening preferences (assessed before and after the DA), 10-year Gail model risk estimate, and whether the information was surprising and different from past messages.

resultsBefore viewing the DA, 27.0% of participants preferred to delay screening (vs. having mammography at their current age), compared with 38.5% after the DA. There was no increase in the number never wanting mammography (5.4% before the DA vs. 4.3% after the DA). Participants who preferred to delay screening had lower breast cancer risk than those who preferred not to delay. The information about overdiagnosis was surprising for 37.4% of participants versus 27.2% and 22.9% for information about false-positive results and screening benefits, respectively. LIMITATION: Respondent preferences may have been influenced by the then-current USPSTF guideline.

conclusionThere are women in their 40s who would prefer to have mammography at an older age, especially after being informed of the benefits and harms of screening. Women who wanted to delay screening were at lower breast cancer risk than women who wanted screening at their current age. Many found information about the benefits and harms of mammography surprising. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Cancer Institute.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyPatient PreferenceAdultDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39008858
PMCPMC11625414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.