ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Physics of microscale freeform 3D printing of ice.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional printing of ice structures via evaporative cooling in vacuum.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Fast Image Segmentation Toward Automation of 3D Ice Printing.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Advances and Challenges in 3D Bioprinted Cancer Models: Opportunities for Personalized Medicine and Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ice is emerging as a promising sacrificial material in the rapidly expanding area of advanced manufacturing for creating precise 3D internal geometries. Freeform 3D printing of ice (3D-ICE) can produce microscale ice structures with smooth walls, hierarchical transitions, and curved and overhang features. However, controlling 3D-ICE is challenging due to an incomplete understanding of its complex physics involving heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and phase changes. This work aims to advance our understanding of 3D-ICE physics by combining numerical modeling and experimentation. We developed a 2D thermo-fluidic model to analyze the transition from layered to continuous printing and a 3D thermo-fluidic model for the oblique deposition, which enables curved and overhang geometries. Experiments are conducted and compared with model simulations. We found that high droplet deposition rates enable the continuous deposition mode with a sustained liquid cap on top of the ice, facilitating smooth geometries. The diameter of ice structures is controlled by the droplet deposition frequency. Oblique deposition causes unidirectional spillover of the liquid cap and asymmetric heat transfer at the freeze front, rotating the freeze front. These results provide valuable insights for reproducible 3D-ICE printing that could be applied across various fields, including tissue engineering, microfluidics, and soft robotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.