Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39008361›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2024

Development of Interoperable Computable Phenotype Algorithms for Adverse Events of Special Interest to Be Used for Biologics Safety Surveillance: Validation Study.

Ashley A Holdefer, Jeno Pizarro, Patrick Saunders-Hastings, Jeffrey Beers, Arianna Sang, Aaron Zachary Hettinger, Joseph Blumenthal, Erik Martinez, Lance Daniel Jones, Matthew Deady and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashley A HoldeferIBM Consulting, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-0170-3300
Jeno PizarroIBM Consulting, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-9507-7185
Patrick Saunders-HastingsAccenture Inc, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3602-0842
Jeffrey BeersIBM Consulting, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5363-0434
Arianna SangIBM Consulting, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-5784-9572
Aaron Zachary HettingerCenter for Biostatistics, Informatics and Data Science, MedStar Health Research Institute, Columbia, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0483-5788
Joseph BlumenthalCenter for Biostatistics, Informatics and Data Science, MedStar Health Research Institute, Columbia, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-6877-9039
Erik MartinezIBM Consulting, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-4598-1645
Lance Daniel JonesIBM Consulting, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4924-0123
Matthew DeadyIBM Consulting, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-1761-8058
Hussein EzzeldinCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7375-6456
Steven A AndersonCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2517-0271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse events associated with vaccination have been evaluated by epidemiological studies and more recently have gained additional attention with the emergency use authorization of several COVID-19 vaccines. As part of its responsibility to conduct postmarket surveillance, the US Food and Drug Administration continues to monitor several adverse events of special interest (AESIs) to ensure vaccine safety, including for COVID-19.

objectiveThis study is part of the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative, which aims to improve the Food and Drug Administration's postmarket surveillance capabilities while minimizing public burden. This study aimed to enhance active surveillance efforts through a rules-based, computable phenotype algorithm to identify 5 AESIs being monitored by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention for COVID-19 or other vaccines: anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, and febrile seizure. This study examined whether these phenotypes have sufficiently high positive predictive value (PPV) to ensure that the cases selected for surveillance are reasonably likely to be a postbiologic adverse event. This allows patient privacy, and security concerns for the data sharing of patients who had nonadverse events can be properly accounted for when evaluating the cost-benefit aspect of our approach.

methodsAESI phenotype algorithms were developed to apply to electronic health record data at health provider organizations across the country by querying for standard and interoperable codes. The codes queried in the rules represent symptoms, diagnoses, or treatments of the AESI sourced from published case definitions and input from clinicians. To validate the performance of the algorithms, we applied them to electronic health record data from a US academic health system and provided a sample of cases for clinicians to evaluate. Performance was assessed using PPV.

resultsWith a PPV of 93.3%, our anaphylaxis algorithm performed the best. The PPVs for our febrile seizure, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombocytopenia syndrome, and Guillain-Barré syndrome algorithms were 89%, 83.5%, 70.2%, and 47.2%, respectively.

conclusionsGiven our algorithm design and performance, our results support continued research into using interoperable algorithms for widespread AESI postmarket detection.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPhenotypeAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsBiological ProductsCOVID-19Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiological Productsadverse eventcomputable phenotypeCOVID-19 vaccineelectronic health recordsFood and Drug Administrationpostmarket surveillance systemreal-world datavaccine safetyvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID39008361
PMCPMC11287092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.