Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39008350›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2024

Do Measures of Real-World Physical Behavior Provide Insights Into the Well-Being and Physical Function of Cancer Survivors? Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Shelby L Bachman, Emma Gomes, Suvekshya Aryal, David Cella, Ieuan Clay, Kate Lyden, Heather J Leach

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03781154 (Predictors of Physical Activity Maintenance in Colorectal Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03781154 phase3completednot on this map

Predictors of Physical Activity Maintenance in Colorectal Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2019 to 2023Enrolled31ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsGroup Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A clinical study on fall risk assessment and preventive nursing in older adults with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy-a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shelby L BachmanVivoSense, Inc, Newport Coast, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4460-4661
Emma GomesDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2431-9860
Suvekshya AryalVivoSense, Inc, Newport Coast, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-4919
David CellaFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9881-4541
Ieuan ClayVivoSense, Inc, Newport Coast, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-8834
Kate LydenVivoSense, Inc, Newport Coast, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-9007
Heather J LeachDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-2225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the number of cancer survivors increases, maintaining health-related quality of life in cancer survivorship is a priority. This necessitates accurate and reliable methods to assess how cancer survivors are feeling and functioning. Real-world digital measures derived from wearable sensors offer potential for monitoring well-being and physical function in cancer survivorship, but questions surrounding the clinical utility of these measures remain to be answered.

objectiveIn this secondary analysis, we used 2 existing data sets to examine how measures of real-world physical behavior, captured with a wearable accelerometer, were related to aerobic fitness and self-reported well-being and physical function in a sample of individuals who had completed cancer treatment.

methodsOverall, 86 disease-free cancer survivors aged 21-85 years completed self-report assessments of well-being and physical function, as well as a submaximal exercise test that was used to estimate their aerobic fitness, quantified as predicted submaximal oxygen uptake (VO

resultsSpearman correlation analyses indicated that 6 (86%) of the 7 accelerometry-derived measures of real-world physical behavior were not significantly correlated with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General total well-being or linked Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function scores (Ps≥.08). In contrast, all but one of the physical behavior measures were significantly correlated with submaximal VO

conclusionsIn a sample of disease-free cancer survivors, we found that several measures of real-world physical behavior were more associated with aerobic fitness than with self-reported well-being and physical function. These results highlight the possibility that in individuals who have completed cancer treatment, measures of real-world physical behavior may provide additional information compared with self-reported and performance measures. To advance the appropriate use of digital measures in oncology clinical research, further research evaluating the clinical utility of real-world physical behavior over time in large, representative samples of cancer survivors is warranted.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03781154; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03781154.

Indexed as

accelerometercancer survivorscancer survivorshipdigital health technologyhealth-related quality of lifephysical behaviorphysical function

Identifiers

PMID39008350
PMCPMC11287100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.