Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39008297›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2024

Use of Massage Therapy for Pain, 2018-2023: A Systematic Review.

Selene Mak, Jennifer Allen, Meron Begashaw, Isomi Miake-Lye, Jessica Beroes-Severin, Gerardo De Vries, Emily Lawson, Paul G Shekelle

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep Tissue Massage Therapy: Effects on Muscle Recovery and Performance in Athletes.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Selene MakVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Jennifer AllenVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Meron BegashawVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Isomi Miake-LyeVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Jessica Beroes-SeverinVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Gerardo De VriesVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Emily LawsonRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Paul G ShekelleVeterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Massage therapy is a popular treatment that has been advocated for dozens of painful adult health conditions and has a large evidence base. Objective: To map systematic reviews, conclusions, and certainty or quality of evidence for outcomes of massage therapy for painful adult health conditions. Evidence Review: In this systematic review, a computerized search was conducted of PubMed, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, the Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science from 2018 to 2023. Included studies were systematic reviews of massage therapy for pain in adult health conditions that formally rated the certainty, quality, or strength of evidence for conclusions. Studies of sports massage therapy, osteopathy, dry cupping or dry needling, and internal massage therapy (eg, for pelvic floor pain) were ineligible, as were self-administered massage therapy techniques, such as foam rolling. Reviews were categorized as those with at least 1 conclusion rated as high-certainty evidence, at least 1 conclusion rated as moderate-certainty evidence, and all conclusions rated as low- or very low-certainty evidence; a full list of conclusions and certainty of evidence was collected. Findings: A total of 129 systematic reviews of massage therapy for painful adult health conditions were found; of these, 41 reviews used a formal method to rate certainty or quality of evidence of their conclusions and 17 reviews were mapped, covering 13 health conditions. Across these reviews, no conclusions were rated as high certainty of evidence. There were 7 conclusions that were rated as moderate-certainty evidence; all remaining conclusions were rated as low- or very low-certainty evidence. All conclusions rated as moderate certainty were that massage therapy had a beneficial associations with pain. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that despite a large number of randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews of massage therapy for painful adult health conditions rated a minority of conclusions as moderate-certainty evidence and that conclusions with moderate- or high-certainty evidence that massage therapy was superior to other active therapies were rare.

Indexed as

MassagePain ManagementAdultFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID39008297
PMCPMC11250267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.