ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2024
Acknowledging acute kidney disease following ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy: results from a tertiary care referral center.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Changes in renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease after ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis from EAU endourology.Urolithiasis · 2026Pooled it
- A Retrospective comparative analysis of postoperative renal function modification following retrograde intrarenal surgery versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (≤ 26Ch) using serum creatinine-based metrics.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Balancing Stone Prevention and Kidney Function: A Therapeutic Dilemma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney disease (AKD) is a recently described syndrome consisting of kidney function abnormalities lasting less than 3 months. Little is known regarding AKD following ureteroscopy (URS) and laser lithotripsy.
objectiveTo evaluate the occurrence and evolution of AKD in stone patients treated with URS. MATERIALS AND
methodsData from 284 patients treated with URS for urinary stones were retrospectively analyzed. According to the KDIGO 2020 criteria, AKD was defined as postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) occurrence, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease ≥ 35%, or serum creatinine (SCr) increase ≥ 50%. AKI was defined as SCr increase ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 50%. AKD evolution was evaluated 60 days post-URS. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression analyses tested the association of patients' characteristics and perioperative data with the occurrence of AKD.
resultsOverall, postoperative AKD occurred in 32 (11.3%) patients. Recovery from AKD was found in 26 (82%) patients and persistent AKD occurred in 6 (18%) patients. At UVA, age at surgery (p = 0.05), baseline SCr (p = 0.02), baseline CKD category (p = 0.006), Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.01), operative time (p = 0.04) and postoperative complications (< 0.001) were associated with AKD. At MVA, CKD category (OR 2.99, 95% CI = 1.4-6.3; p = 0.004), operative time (OR 1.01, 95% CI = 1.001-1.018; p = 0.023) and postoperative complications (OR 3.5, 95% CI = 1.46-8.49; p = 0.005) were independent predictors of AKD.
conclusionsAKD is a frequent complication in patients treated with URS. Moreover, AKD persists in a non-neglectable percentage of patients at medium-term follow-up. Therefore, nephrological assessment should be considered, especially in high-risk patients. Current findings should be considered for the peri-operative management of stone patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39008224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.