Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39008116›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024

Infant urinary tract infection in Sweden - A national study of current diagnostic procedures, imaging and treatment.

Magnus Lindén, Therese Rosenblad, Karin Rosenborg, Sverker Hansson, Per Brandström

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Response letter to UTI in infants: less is more, together is better.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. UTI in infants: less is more, together is better.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Magnus Lindén *Department of Pediatrics, Halland Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden. magnus.linden@regionhalland.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5592-1267
Therese Rosenblad *Department of Pediatrics, Lund Children's Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Karin RosenborgSachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sverker HanssonDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Per BrandströmDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infection (UTI) in infants is a common, potentially life-threatening bacterial infection, and must be managed carefully through the entire chain of care from diagnosis, choice of treatment, follow-up and risk stratification of future complications. This Swedish nationwide study of infant UTI was conducted to evaluate the current management of infant UTI, yield of investigations and the Swedish UTI guidelines' ability to detect abnormalities of importance in the urinary tract.

methodsInfants < 1 year with a first episode of UTI were included in a prospective multicenter study. Treatment and follow-up were provided by local pediatricians. Clinical and laboratory findings and imaging results were reported to the coordinating center. The current management and results were compared with a previous Swedish study.

resultsOne thousand three hundred six infants were included. Urine sampling was performed with clean catch technique in 93% of patients. Initial oral antibiotic treatment was used in 63%, predominantly third generation cephalosporines. Permanent kidney abnormalities were found in 10% and dilating vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in 8%. Higher rates of male gender, non-E. coli infection and ultrasound dilatation were seen in infants < 1 month. UTI recurrences were reported in 18%.

conclusionsInfant UTI is still generating a considerable amount of follow-up examinations. There is a significant shift towards clean catch as the main urine sampling method. Voiding cystourethrography is performed less frequently reducing the findings of low grade VUR. The incidence of renal scarring is comparable with earlier studies which suggests that the Swedish guidelines are able to identify individuals with risk for long-term complications.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsUrinary Tract InfectionsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProspective StudiesRecurrenceSwedenUltrasonographyVesico-Ureteral RefluxAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical guidelinesInfantKidney damageUrinary tract infectionUrine samplingVesicoureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID39008116
PMCPMC11413111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.