Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39008086›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Low fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes- systematic review of the literature and metanalysis.

Ioakeim Sapantzoglou, Maria Giourga, Vasileios Pergialiotis, Rafail Mantzioros, Maria Anastasia Daskalaki, Dimitrios Papageorgiou, Panagiotis Antsaklis, Mariana Theodora, Nikolaos Thomakos, Georgios Daskalakis

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ioakeim Sapantzoglou1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece. kimsap1990@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7760-0608
Maria Giourga1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece.
Vasileios Pergialiotis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece.
Rafail Mantzioros1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece.
Maria Anastasia DaskalakiSchool of Medicine, European University of Cyprus, Address: 6, Diogenous Str.Egkomi, 2404, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Dimitrios Papageorgiou1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis Antsaklis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece.
Mariana Theodora1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos Thomakos1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece.
Georgios Daskalakis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias 80 Aven., 2-4, Lourou Str., 11528, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening has emerged as a screening modality for common aneuploidies, further research and several publications over the past decade suggested some correlation between the low concentrations of cfDNA and a number of pregnancy-related complications. The primary goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the potential value of low-ff levels in the prediction of subsequent PE/PIH, GDM, SGA/FGR, and PTB. The meta-analysis results aim at summarizing the currently available literature data and determining the clinical relevance of this biochemical marker and the potential necessity for additional investigation of its utility in complications other than the detection of common aneuploidies.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was designed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It included all observational studies that reported low -ff levels after the performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as part of the screening for chromosomal abnormalities and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely the subsequent development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, and the detection of small for gestational age fetuses or growth-restricted fetuses. The Medline (1966-2041), Scopus (2004-2024), Clinicaltrials.gov (2008-2024), EMBASE (1980-2024), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2024) and Google Scholar (2004-2024) databases were used in our primary search along with the reference lists of electronically retrieved full-text papers. The date of our last search was set at February 29, 2024.

resultsOur search identified 128 potentially relevant studies and,overall, 8 studies were included in the present systematic review that enrolled a total of 72,507 patients. Low ff of cfDNA cfDNA was positively associated with HDP (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.34, 2.06, I-square test: 56%). Low ff of cfDNA was positively associated with GDM (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03, 1.56, I-square test: 76%). Furthermore, low ff levels were positively associated with SGA/FGR (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.32, 2.03, I-square test: 0%). Low ff levels were positively correlated with the risk for PTB but the association did not manage to reach a statistical significant level (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.89, 1.67, I-square test: 66%).

conclusionOur study suggests that low ff is associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including PE/PIH, GDM, and SGA/FGR. However, the relationship between ff and PTB remains unclear due to conflicting evidence. It should be emphasized that further research is needed to reveal the underlying mechanisms behind the association of low ff with adverse pregnancy outcomes and explore its potential role in an overall prenatal screening, which could potentially not be limited to detecting aneuploidies.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsPregnancy OutcomeDiabetes, GestationalFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, Small for Gestational AgeNoninvasive Prenatal TestingPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthCell-Free Nucleic AcidsAdverse outcomesFetal fractionFetal growth restriction’Gestational diabetesNIPTPregnancyPreterm birthPreterm delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.