Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39008067›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Efficacy and safety of rechallenge [

Florian Rosar, Joelle Schuler, Caroline Burgard, Arne Blickle, Mark Bartholomä, Stephan Maus, Sven Petto, Fadi Khreish, Andrea Schaefer, Samer Ezziddin

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Phase 2 Prospective Trial of Retreatment with [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  4. Evaluation of [The Prostate · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Clinical Applications of Theranostics.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  8. PSMA-RECAP: [Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  9. Randomized Phase 2 Trial of an Extended and Flexible Dosing Schedule ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Use ofWiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025
    Article
  11. Pilot experience of [Theranostics · 2025
    Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florian RosarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Joelle SchulerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Caroline BurgardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Arne BlickleDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Mark BartholomäDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Stephan MausDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Sven PettoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Fadi KhreishDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Andrea SchaeferDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Samer EzziddinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University - Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 100, Geb. 50, D-66421, Homburg, Germany. samer.ezziddin@uks.eu.ORCID 0000-0003-4110-3375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimRechallenge of [

methodsForty-seven patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had biochemical response to initial [

resultsAfter one series of RLT rechallenge, a PSA decline of at least 50% was achieved in 27/47 patients (57.4%). The median PFS of all patients was 8.7 mo and the median OS was 22.7 mo, each calculated from the administration of the first rechallenge series. Patients who responded (PSA decline > 50%) to the rechallenge showed a median OS of 27.3 mo. Regarding PFS, a significant correlation (r = 0.4128, p = 0.0323) was found for these patients comparing initial and rechallenge RLT. Ten patients received a second and 3 patients received a third rechallenge series with 8/10 and 3/3 patients responding to repeated RLT rechallenge. No severe deterioration of adverse events rated by CTCAE criteria was observed.

conclusion[

Indexed as

DipeptidesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingLutetiumProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticalsRegistriesRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeDipeptidesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingLutetiumPluvictoProstate-Specific AntigenPSMA-617Radiopharmaceuticals177LumCRPCPSMARadioligand therapyRechallenge

Identifiers

PMID39008067
PMCPMC11527919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.