ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2024
Critical Care of Spinal Cord Injury.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Shifting demographics, characteristics, and outcomes of traumatic spinal cord injury. A systematic review.Spinal cord · 2026Pooled it
- Factors associated with hyponatremia in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Differentiating Weakness-an Atypical Presentation of Acute Neuromuscular Paralysis: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The conserved fibroblast growth factor receptor-based signaling is required for dendrite regeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Review
- Perioperative management in acute and chronic spinal cord injury, narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Mechanistic insights into Nrf2-driven pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting in spinal cord injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Neurological outcomes and predictive factors in traumatic spinal cord injury patients in the intensive care unit.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewSpinal cord injury (SCI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, posing a significant financial burden on patients and the healthcare system. While little can be done to reverse the primary mechanical insult, minimizing secondary injury due to ischemia and inflammation and avoiding complications that adversely affect neurologic outcome represent major goals of management. This article reviews important considerations in the acute critical care management of SCI to improve outcomes. RECENT
findingsNeuroprotective agents, such as riluzole, may allow for improved neurologic recovery but require further investigation at this time. Various forms of neuromodulation, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, are currently under investigation. Early decompression and stabilization of SCI is recommended within 24 h of injury when indicated. Spinal cord perfusion may be optimized with a mean arterial pressure goal from a lower limit of 75-80 to an upper limit of 90-95 mmHg for 3-7 days after injury. The use of corticosteroids remains controversial; however, initiation of a 24-h infusion of methylprednisolone 5.4 mg/kg/hour within 8 h of injury has been found to improve motor scores. Attentive pulmonary and urologic care along with early mobilization can reduce in-hospital complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39008022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.