Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007948›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2024

Present and future of whole-body MRI in metastatic disease and myeloma: how and why you will do it.

Frederic E Lecouvet, Caroline Chabot, Lokmane Taihi, Thomas Kirchgesner, Perrine Triqueneaux, Jacques Malghem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Precision medicine in myeloma demands precision imaging: is whole body MRI the solution?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AI for Lesion Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frederic E LecouvetDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium. frederic.lecouvet@saintluc.uclouvain.be.
Caroline ChabotDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Lokmane TaihiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Thomas KirchgesnerDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Perrine TriqueneauxDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Jacques MalghemDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic disease and myeloma present unique diagnostic challenges due to their multifocal nature. Accurate detection and staging are critical for determining appropriate treatment. Bone scintigraphy, skeletal radiographs and CT have long been the mainstay for the assessment of these diseases, but have limitations, including reduced sensitivity and radiation exposure. Whole-body MRI has emerged as a highly sensitive and radiation-free alternative imaging modality. Initially developed for skeletal screening, it has extended tumor screening to all organs, providing morphological and physiological information on tumor tissue. Along with PET/CT, whole-body MRI is now accepted for staging and response assessment in many malignancies. It is the first choice in an ever increasing number of cancers (such as myeloma, lobular breast cancer, advanced prostate cancer, myxoid liposarcoma, bone sarcoma, …). It has also been validated as the method of choice for cancer screening in patients with a predisposition to cancer and for staging cancers observed during pregnancy. The current and future challenges for WB-MRI are its availability facing this number of indications, and its acceptance by patients, radiologists and health authorities. Guidelines have been developed to optimize image acquisition and reading, assessment of lesion response to treatment, and to adapt examination designs to specific cancers. The implementation of 3D acquisition, Dixon method, and deep learning-based image optimization further improve the diagnostic performance of the technique and reduce examination durations. Whole-body MRI screening is feasible in less than 30 min. This article reviews validated indications, recent developments, growing acceptance, and future perspectives of whole-body MRI.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple MyelomaWhole Body ImagingBone NeoplasmsForecastingHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingBoneCancerImagingMetastasisMRIMultiple myelomaWhole-body imaging

Identifiers

PMID39007948
PMCPMC11303436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.