Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007831›Full record

ReviewEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Julien Ternacle, Sébastien Hecht, Hélène Eltchaninoff, Erwan Salaun, Marie-Annick Clavel, Nancy Côté, Philippe Pibarot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgical Explant of Degenerated Transcatheter Valves: A New Type of Threat?Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiac Adaptation After Device Deployment.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  19. Four-year durability of the Myval balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Long-term structural valve deterioration after TAVI: insights from the EORP ESC Valve Durability TAVI Registry.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julien TernacleUnité Médico-Chirurgicale des Valvulopathies, Hôpital Haut-Leveque, CHU Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
Sébastien HechtDepartment of Cardiology, Québec Heart & Lung Institute - Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Hélène EltchaninoffDepartment of Cardiology, University of Rouen Normandie, Inserm U1096, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.
Erwan SalaunDepartment of Cardiology, Québec Heart & Lung Institute - Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Annick ClavelDepartment of Cardiology, Québec Heart & Lung Institute - Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Nancy CôtéDepartment of Cardiology, Québec Heart & Lung Institute - Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Philippe PibarotDepartment of Cardiology, Québec Heart & Lung Institute - Laval University, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is now utilised as a less invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across the whole spectrum of surgical risk. Long-term durability of the bioprosthetic valves has become a key goal of TAVI as this procedure is now considered for younger and lower-risk populations. The purpose of this article is to present a state-of-the-art overview on the definition, aetiology, risk factors, mechanisms, diagnosis, clinical impact, and management of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) and failure (BVF) following TAVI with a comparative perspective versus SAVR. Structural valve deterioration (SVD) is the main factor limiting the durability of the bioprosthetic valves used for TAVI or SAVR, but non-structural BVD, such as prosthesis-patient mismatch and paravalvular regurgitation, as well as valve thrombosis or endocarditis may also lead to BVF. The incidence of BVF related to SVD or other causes is low (<5%) at midterm (5- to 8-year) follow-up and compares favourably with that of SAVR. The long-term follow-up data of randomised trials conducted with the first generations of transcatheter heart valves also suggest similar valve durability in TAVI versus SAVR at 10 years, but these trials suffer from major survivorship bias, and the long-term durability of TAVI will need to be confirmed by the analysis of the low-risk TAVI versus SAVR trials at 10 years.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveHeart Valve ProsthesisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39007831
PMCPMC11228542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.