ArticleActa orthopaedica2024
Simultaneous correction of leg length discrepancy and angular deformity of the distal femur with retrograde Precice nails: a retrospective analysis of 45 patients.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional virtual modeling for lower limb deformity correction over intramedullary nail.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Mechanism Failures in Externally Controlled Motorized Intramedullary Lengthening Nails: A Systematic Review.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMagnetically controlled motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) can be employed for simultaneous correction of angular deformities of the distal femur and leg length discrepancy. This spares typical complications of external fixators but requires precise preoperative planning and exact intraoperative execution. To date, its results are insufficiently reported. We aimed to elucidate the following questions: (i) Is acute angular deformity correction and gradual femoral lengthening via a retrograde ILN a reliable and precise treatment option? (ii) What are the most common complications of treatment?
methodsAcute angular deformity correction and subsequent gradual lengthening of the distal femur with retrograde ILN was retrospectively analyzed in 45 patients (median patient age: 15 years, interquartile range [IQR] 13-19 and median follow-up: 40 months, IQR 31-50). Outcome parameters were accuracy, precision, reliability, bone healing, and complications of treatment.
resultsThe median distraction was 46 mm (IQR 29-49), median distraction and consolidation index 0.9 mm/day (IQR 0.7-1.0) and 29 days/cm (IQR 24-43), respectively. The median preoperative mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was 30 mm (IQR 23-39) in the varus cohort and -25 mm (IQR -29 to -15) in the valgus cohort and reduced to a mean of 8 mm (standard deviation [SD] 8) and -3 (SD 10), respectively. Accuracy, precision, and reliability of lengthening were 94%, 95% and 96%, respectively. Accuracy and precision of deformity correction were 92% and 89%, respectively. In total, 40/45 of patients achieved distraction with a difference of less than 1 cm from the initial plan and a postoperative MAD ranging from -10 mm to +15 mm. In 13/45 patients unplanned additional surgeries were conducted to achieve treatment goal with nonunion being the most frequent (4/45) and knee subluxation (3/45) the most severe complication.
conclusionAcute deformity correction and subsequent lengthening of the distal femur with retrograde ILN is a reliable and accurate treatment achieving treatment goal in 89% but unplanned additional surgeries in 29% of patients should be anticipated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.