ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
GTE: a graph learning framework for prediction of T-cell receptors and epitopes binding specificity.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- DynaTCR: dynamic hard-negative ensemble graph learning improves TCR-epitope binding prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- DUET: a graph-based workflow for TCR-epitope prioritization and tumor-reactive T-cell identification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Modeling TCR-Epitope Recognition Specificity: What We Should Learn to Succeed.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Computational Methods in Immunoinformatics: Epitope Discovery and Diagnostic Applications.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Profiling antigen-binding affinity of B cell repertoires in tumors by deep learning predicts immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes.Nature cancer · 2025Article
- SageTCR: a structure-based model integrating residue- and atom-level representations for enhanced TCR-pMHC binding prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- GRAPE: graph-regularized protein language modeling unlocks TCR-epitope binding specificity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Computation strategies and clinical applications in neoantigen discovery towards precision cancer immunotherapy.Biomarker research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interaction between T-cell receptors (TCRs) and peptides (epitopes) presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules (MHC) is fundamental to the immune response. Accurate prediction of TCR-epitope interactions is crucial for advancing the understanding of various diseases and their prevention and treatment. Existing methods primarily rely on sequence-based approaches, overlooking the inherent topology structure of TCR-epitope interaction networks. In this study, we present $GTE$, a novel heterogeneous Graph neural network model based on inductive learning to capture the topological structure between TCRs and Epitopes. Furthermore, we address the challenge of constructing negative samples within the graph by proposing a dynamic edge update strategy, enhancing model learning with the nonbinding TCR-epitope pairs. Additionally, to overcome data imbalance, we adapt the Deep AUC Maximization strategy to the graph domain. Extensive experiments are conducted on four public datasets to demonstrate the superiority of exploring underlying topological structures in predicting TCR-epitope interactions, illustrating the benefits of delving into complex molecular networks. The implementation code and data are available at https://github.com/uta-smile/GTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.