Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007594›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

A survey of generative AI for de novo drug design: new frontiers in molecule and protein generation.

Xiangru Tang, Howard Dai, Elizabeth Knight, Fang Wu, Yunyang Li, Tianxiao Li, Mark Gerstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. MolOrgGPT:Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Apo2Mol: 3D Molecule Generation via Dynamic Pocket-Aware Diffusion Models.Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiangru TangDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-2700-4513
Howard DaiDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Elizabeth KnightSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Fang WuComputer Science Department, Stanford University, CA 94305, United States.
Yunyang LiDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Tianxiao LiProgram in Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Mark GersteinDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9746-3719

Funding

Schmidt Futures
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven methods can vastly improve the historically costly drug design process, with various generative models already in widespread use. Generative models for de novo drug design, in particular, focus on the creation of novel biological compounds entirely from scratch, representing a promising future direction. Rapid development in the field, combined with the inherent complexity of the drug design process, creates a difficult landscape for new researchers to enter. In this survey, we organize de novo drug design into two overarching themes: small molecule and protein generation. Within each theme, we identify a variety of subtasks and applications, highlighting important datasets, benchmarks, and model architectures and comparing the performance of top models. We take a broad approach to AI-driven drug design, allowing for both micro-level comparisons of various methods within each subtask and macro-level observations across different fields. We discuss parallel challenges and approaches between the two applications and highlight future directions for AI-driven de novo drug design as a whole. An organized repository of all covered sources is available at https://github.com/gersteinlab/GenAI4Drug.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DesignProteinsComputational BiologyHumansProteinsdrug designgenerative modelmolecule generationprotein generation

Identifiers

PMID39007594
PMCPMC11247410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.