Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007562›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024

Improved efficiency using sequential automated immunoassays for syphilis screening in blood donors.

Anthea Cheng, Anindita Das, Claire E Styles, Zin Naing, William D Rawlinson, Iain B Gosbell

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anthea ChengPathology and Clinical Governance, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-5474
Anindita DasPathology and Clinical Governance, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5639-2136
Claire E StylesPathology and Clinical Governance, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-847X
Zin NaingSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
William D RawlinsonSerology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0988-7827
Iain B GosbellPathology and Clinical Governance, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5245-5152

Funding

Australian governments (Federal Government)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using sequential immunoassays for the screening of blood donors is well described for viral serology testing but not for the screening of syphilis. In this study, we report the evaluation results and 2-year sequential testing data using two highly sensitive automated serology assays, the Alinity s Syphilis chemiluminescent immunoassay for screening, with all repeatedly reactive samples then tested on the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. We screened 1,767,782 blood donor samples between 7 July 2021 and 6 July 2023 and found the Alinity false-positive rate to be low at 0.08% (1,456/1,767,782). The common false-positive rate between the two assays was also low (3.83%, 58/1,514). Concordantly reactive samples were further tested using a IMPORTANCE: The serodiagnosis for syphilis usually follows two methodologies-a "traditional" algorithm using a non-treponemal test followed by confirmation using a treponemal test, or a "reverse" algorithm using a treponemal test followed by a non-treponemal test. There are limited reports in the literature of using a modified reverse algorithm (treponemal test followed by a second treponemal test), and to the best of knowledge, there are currently no published articles using two highly sensitive automated immunoassays to aid the serodiagnosis of syphilis. In addition, the

Indexed as

Blood DonorsSyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidumAntibodies, BacterialAutomation, LaboratoryFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansImmunoassayMaleMass ScreeningSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, Bacterialblood donor screeningsequential immunoassayssyphilis

Identifiers

PMID39007562
PMCPMC11323462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.