Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007484›Full record

ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2025

Adoption of vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy: A single tertiary experience.

Supuni Kapurubandara, Jan Baekelandt, Patrick Laws, Jenny King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supuni KapurubandaraUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8259-9405
Jan BaekelandtThe Department of Gynecological Oncology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
Patrick LawsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jenny KingUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1055-5715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaginal hysterectomy (VH) rate is declining despite being considered as the optimal minimally invasive option for hysterectomy with reduced operative time and length of stay compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). Vaginal assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy (VANH) combines the advantages of both vaginal and endoscopic approach to surgery.

aimsTo report feasibility and early experience of a single surgeon adopting VANH at a tertiary Australian hospital. MATERIALS AND

methodsProspective review of the first 20 VANH cases with complete data set collected retrospectively including patient demographics, indication for surgery and perioperative outcomes.

resultsThe median age of the first 20 participants was 51.5 years (47-57 years of age) and the median body mass index was 33.5 kg/m

conclusionsVANH is feasible but there is a learning curve to achieve competence in this technique, which requires adequate training in the early stages of adoption with careful case selection. Until further robust data is available to determine the clinical benefit and safety profile of VANH, patients should be carefully counselled and the decision on mode of hysterectomy be individualised.

Indexed as

Hysterectomy, VaginalNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryAustraliaBlood Loss, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMiddle AgedOperative TimeProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care Centershysterectomynatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeryNOTESvaginal hysterectomyvNOTES

Identifiers

PMID39007484
PMCPMC11924166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.