ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2024
CD66b
Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking barriers in peritoneal fibrosis: extracellular vesicles as promising diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Engineering Extracellular Vesicles for Anti-Aging Therapy: Mechanisms, Applications, and Perspectives.Aging cell · 2026Review
- Endothelial Integrin-Linked Kinase (ILK) Deficiency Promotes Endothelial Activation and Cardiovascular Dysfunction via Receptor Interacting Protein Kinase-1 (RIPK1) Enriched-Extracellular Vesicle Signalling.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Differential regulation of neutrophil degranulation by p38 MAPK and mitochondrial ROS duringFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicles as key biomarkers in COVID-19: insights into disease severity and mortality through CD86 and other immune markers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicles for Clinical Diagnostics: From Bulk Measurements to Single-Vesicle Analysis.ACS nano · 2025Review
- Circulating extracellular vesicles from severe COVID-19 patients induce lung inflammation.mSphere · 2024Article
- CD66bJournal of extracellular vesicles · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a major public health burden. We hypothesised that circulating extracellular vesicles (cEVs), key players in health and disease, could trace the cell changes during COVID-19 infection and recovery. Therefore, we studied the temporal trend of cEV and inflammatory marker levels in plasma samples of COVID-19 patients that were collected within 24 h of patient admission (baseline, n = 80) and after hospital discharge at day-90 post-admission (n = 59). Inflammatory markers were measured by standard biochemical methods. cEVs were quantitatively and phenotypically characterized by high-sensitivity nano flow cytometry. In patients recovered from COVID-19 lower levels of inflammatory markers were detected. cEVs from vascular (endothelial cells) and blood (platelets, distinct immune subsets) cells were significantly reduced at day-90 compared to admission levels, a pattern also observed for cEVs from progenitor, perivascular and epithelial cells. The best discriminatory power for COVID-19 severity was found for inflammatory markers lactate dehydrogenase and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and for granulocyte/macrophage-released CD66b
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.