Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007327›Full record

ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2024

Embracing epistemic uncertainty: a risk evaluation method for pollutants in stormwater.

Vincent Pons, Merethe Strømberg, Godecke-Tobias Blecken, Franz Tscheikner-Gratl, Maria Viklander, Tone Merete Muthanna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent PonsDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Urban Water Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå 971 87, Sweden; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, water and wastewater (VA) group, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim N-7491, Norway E-mail: vincent.pons@ntnu.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8574-5674
Merethe StrømbergDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, water and wastewater (VA) group, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim N-7491, Norway.
Godecke-Tobias BleckenDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Urban Water Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå 971 87, Sweden.
Franz Tscheikner-GratlDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, water and wastewater (VA) group, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim N-7491, Norway.
Maria ViklanderDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Urban Water Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå 971 87, Sweden.
Tone Merete MuthannaDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Urban Water Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå 971 87, Sweden; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, water and wastewater (VA) group, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim N-7491, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we show that pollutants of emerging concern are, by nature, prone to the emergence of epistemic uncertainty. We also show that the current uncertainty quantification methods used for pollutant modelling rely almost exclusively on parameter uncertainty, which is not adequate to tackle epistemic uncertainty affecting the model structure. We, therefore, suggest a paradigm shift in the current pollutant modelling approaches by adding a term explicitly accounting for epistemic uncertainties. In a proof-of-concept, we use this approach to investigate the impact of epistemic uncertainty in the fluctuation of pollutants during wet-weather discharge (input information) on the distribution of mass of pollutants (output distributions). We found that the range of variability negatively impacts the tail of output distributions. The fluctuation time, associated with high covariance between discharge and concentration, is a major driver for the output distributions. Adapting to different levels of epistemic uncertainty, our approach helps to identify critical unknown information in the fluctuation of pollutant concentration. Such information can be used in a risk management context and to design smart monitoring campaigns.

Indexed as

Water Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringModels, TheoreticalRainRisk AssessmentUncertaintyWater Pollutants, Chemicalepistemic uncertaintyGaussian processmonitoring campaignpollutant modellingurban drainage system

Identifiers

PMID39007327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.