Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007312›Full record

ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2024

Model parameter estimation with imprecise information.

Wolfgang Rauch, Nikolaus Rauch, Manfred Kleidorfer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Modelling and integrated assessment of urban water systems.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wolfgang RauchUniversity of Innsbruck, Unit of Environmental Engineering, Technikerstrasse 13, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria E-mail: Wolfgang.Rauch@uibk.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-2832
Nikolaus RauchUniversity of Innsbruck, Interactive Graphics and Simulation Group, Technikerstrasse 13, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1326-709X
Manfred KleidorferUniversity of Innsbruck, Unit of Environmental Engineering, Technikerstrasse 13, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4001-1711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model parameter estimation is a well-known inverse problem, as long as single-value point data are available as observations of system performance measurement. However, classical statistical methods, such as the minimization of an objective function or maximum likelihood, are no longer straightforward, when measurements are imprecise in nature. Typical examples of the latter include censored data and binary information. Here, we explore Approximate Bayesian Computation as a simple method to perform model parameter estimation with such imprecise information. We demonstrate the method for the example of a plain rainfall-runoff model and illustrate the advantages and shortcomings. Last, we outline the value of Shapley values to determine which type of observation contributes to the parameter estimation and which are of minor importance.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalRainapproximate Bayesian computationbinary datacalibrationimprecise informationinverse modelingShapley value

Identifiers

PMID39007312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.