Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007128›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Training immunophenotyping deep learning models with the same-section ground truth cell label derivation method improves virtual staining accuracy.

Abu Bakr Azam, Felicia Wee, Juha P Väyrynen, Willa Wen-You Yim, Yue Zhen Xue, Bok Leong Chua, Jeffrey Chun Tatt Lim, Aditya Chidambaram Somasundaram, Daniel Shao Weng Tan, Angela Takano and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Abu Bakr Azam *School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Felicia Wee *Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Juha P VäyrynenTranslational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Willa Wen-You YimInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Yue Zhen XueInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Bok Leong ChuaSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Jeffrey Chun Tatt LimInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Aditya Chidambaram SomasundaramSchool of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel Shao Weng TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Angela TakanoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Chun Yuen ChowDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Li Yan KhorDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Tony Kiat Hon LimDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Joe YeongInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Mai Chan LauBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Matrix, Singapore, Singapore.
Yiyu CaiSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Deep learning (DL) models predicting biomarker expression in images of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tissues can improve access to multi-marker immunophenotyping, crucial for therapeutic monitoring, biomarker discovery, and personalized treatment development. Conventionally, these models are trained on ground truth cell labels derived from IHC-stained tissue sections adjacent to H&E-stained ones, which might be less accurate than labels from the same section. Although many such DL models have been developed, the impact of ground truth cell label derivation methods on their performance has not been studied. Methodology: In this study, we assess the impact of cell label derivation on H&E model performance, with CD3 Results: We show that the same-section model exhibited significantly improved prediction performance compared to the 'serial-section' model. Furthermore, the same-section model outperformed the serial-section model in stratifying lung cancer patients within a public lung cancer cohort based on survival outcomes, demonstrating its potential clinical utility. Discussion: Collectively, our findings suggest that employing ground truth cell labels obtained through the same-section approach boosts immunophenotyping DL solutions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImmunophenotypingLung NeoplasmsStaining and LabelingBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleT-LymphocytesBiomarkers, TumorCD3deep learningground truth cell labelhematoxylin and eosin (H&E)Pix2Pix generative adversarial network (P2P-GAN)tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)virtual staining

Identifiers

PMID39007128
PMCPMC11239356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.