ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Establishment and validation of a nomogram containing cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 for the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our study aimed to develop a nomogram incorporating cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) to assist in differentiating between patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A total of 487 patients who were diagnosed with ICC and HCC at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were included in this study. The patients were divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort based on whether the data collection was retrospective or prospective. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to select variables for the nomogram. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plots. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the nomogram's net benefits at various threshold probabilities. Results: Six variables, including CYFRA21-1, were incorporated to establish the nomogram. Its satisfactory discriminative ability was indicated by the AUC (0.972 for the training cohort, 0.994 for the validation cohort), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) values. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the calibration plots demonstrated favorable consistency between the nomogram predictions and the actual observations. Moreover, DCA revealed the clinical utility and superior discriminative ability of the nomogram compared to the model without CYFRA21-1 and the model consisting of the logarithm of alpha-fetoprotein (Log AFP) and the logarithm of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (Log CA19-9). Additionally, the AUC values suggested that the discriminative ability of Log CYFRA21-1 was greater than that of the other variables used as diagnostic biomarkers. Conclusions: This study developed and validated a nomogram including CYFRA21-1, which can aid clinicians in the differential diagnosis of ICC and HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.