Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007088›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2024

Evaluating synthetic neuroimaging data augmentation for automatic brain tumour segmentation with a deep fully-convolutional network.

Fawad Asadi, Thanate Angsuwatanakul, Jamie A O'Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fawad AsadiCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
Thanate AngsuwatanakulCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
Jamie A O'ReillySchool of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas observed in medical images require expert neuro-radiologist evaluation for treatment planning and monitoring, motivating development of intelligent systems capable of automating aspects of tumour evaluation. Deep learning models for automatic image segmentation rely on the amount and quality of training data. In this study we developed a neuroimaging synthesis technique to augment data for training fully-convolutional networks (U-nets) to perform automatic glioma segmentation. We used StyleGAN2-ada to simultaneously generate fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance images and corresponding glioma segmentation masks. Synthetic data were successively added to real training data (n = 2751) in fourteen rounds of 1000 and used to train U-nets that were evaluated on held-out validation (n = 590) and test sets (n = 588). U-nets were trained with and without geometric augmentation (translation, zoom and shear), and Dice coefficients were computed to evaluate segmentation performance. We also monitored the number of training iterations before stopping, total training time, and time per iteration to evaluate computational costs associated with training each U-net. Synthetic data augmentation yielded marginal improvements in Dice coefficients (validation set +0.0409, test set +0.0355), whereas geometric augmentation improved generalization (standard deviation between training, validation and test set performances of 0.01 with, and 0.04 without geometric augmentation). Based on the modest performance gains for automatic glioma segmentation we find it hard to justify the computational expense of developing a synthetic image generation pipeline. Future work may seek to optimize the efficiency of synthetic data generation for augmentation of neuroimaging data.

Indexed as

Brain tissue segmentationGenerative adversarial networksGlioblastomaHead MRISynthetic medical images

Identifiers

PMID39007088
PMCPMC11240293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.