Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007082›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2024

Rat ventral caudal nerve as a model for long distance regeneration.

Ivo Vanický, Juraj Blaško, Zoltán Tomori, Zuzana Michalová, Eva Székiová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivo VanickýInstitute of Neurobiology Biomedical Research Center Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4, Košice 04001, Slovakia.
Juraj BlaškoInstitute of Neurobiology Biomedical Research Center Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4, Košice 04001, Slovakia.
Zoltán TomoriInstitute of Experimental Physics Slovak Academy of Sciences, Watsonova 47, Košice 04001, Slovakia.
Zuzana MichalováInstitute of Neurobiology Biomedical Research Center Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4, Košice 04001, Slovakia.
Eva SzékiováInstitute of Neurobiology Biomedical Research Center Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4, Košice 04001, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the rat, tail nerves are the longest peripheral nerves in their body. We suggest that ventral caudal nerve (VCN) may serve as a model for studying nerve injury and long distance regeneration. For this purpose, we have studied the anatomy and morphometry of the VCN in control animals. 10 cm long segment of the VCN was removed, and transversal sections were collected at 10 mm distances. The myelinated axons were counted, and the series of data were used to characterize the craniocaudal tapering of the nerve. In a separate group of animals, retrograde tracing with Fluorogold was used to localize and quantitate the spinal neurons projecting their axons into the VCN. After complete nerve transection, the time course of histopathological changes in the distal segment was studied. The primary goal was to define the time needed for axonal disintegration. In later periods, axonal debris removal and rearrangement of tissue elements was documented. After compression injury (axonotmesis), Wallerian degeneration was followed by spontaneous regeneration of axons. We show that the growing axons will span the 10 cm distance within 4-8 weeks. After different survival periods, the numbers of regenerating axons were counted at 10 mm distances. These data were used to characterize the dynamics of axonal regeneration during 4 months' survival period. In the present study we show that axonal regeneration across 10 cm distance can be studied and quantitatively analyzed in a small laboratory animal.

Indexed as

InjuryPeripheral nerveRatRegenerationVentral caudal nerve

Identifiers

PMID39007082
PMCPMC11240296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.