Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39007061›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Outcomes of patients with advanced solid tumors who discontinued immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Pala, Eleonora Pagan, Isabella Sala, Chiara Oriecuia, Matteo Oliari, Tommaso De Pas, Claudia Specchia, Emilia Cocorocchio, Emma Zattarin, Giovanna Rossi and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced eosinophilic fasciitis: A pharmacovigilance and EADV Task force study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Laura PalaDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Eleonora PaganDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Isabella SalaDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Chiara OriecuiaDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Matteo OliariDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Tommaso De PasDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Claudia SpecchiaDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Emilia CocorocchioDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Emma ZattarinDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Giovanna RossiDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Chiara CataniaDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Giovanni Luca CeresoliDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Daniele LaszloDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Jacopo CanzianDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Elena ValenziDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
Giuseppe VialeDepartment of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS Milan, Italy.
Richard D GelberDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Frontier Science & Technology Research Foundation, Boston, USA.
Alberto MantovaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Vincenzo BagnardiDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Fabio ConfortiDivision of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The outcome of patients with metastatic tumors who discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) not for progressive disease (PD) has been poorly explored. We performed a meta-analysis of all studies reporting the clinical outcome of patients who discontinued ICIs for reasons other than PD. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases, from the inception of each database to December 2023, for clinical trials (randomized or not) and observational studies assessing PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in patients with metastatic solid tumors who discontinued treatment for reasons other than PD. Each study had to provide swimmer plots or Kaplan-Meier survival curves enabling the reconstruction of individual patient-level data on progression-free survival (PFS) following the discontinuation of immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS from the date of treatment discontinuation overall and according to tumor histotype, type of treatment and reason of discontinuation. The Combersure's method was used to estimate meta-analytical non-parametric summary survival curves assuming random effects at study level. Findings: Thirty-six studies (2180 patients) were included. The pooled median PFS (mPFS) was 24.7 months (95% CI, 18.8-30.6) and the PFS-rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was respectively 69.8% (95% CI, 63.1-77.3), 51.0% (95% CI, 43.4-59.8) and 34.0% (95% CI, 27.0-42.9). Univariable analysis showed that the mPFS was significantly longer for patients with melanoma (43.0 months), as compared with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 13.5 months) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC, 10.0 months; between-strata comparison test p-value < 0.001); for patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 + anti-CTLA-4 as compared with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy (44.6 versus 19.9 months; p-value < 0.001), and in NSCLC when the reason of treatment discontinuation was elective as compared with toxicity onset (19.6 versus 4.8 months; p-value = 0.003). The multivariable analysis confirmed these differences. Interpretation: The long-term outcome of patients who stopped ICIs for reasons other than PD was substantially affected by clinicopathological features: PFS after treatment discontinuation was longer in patients with melanoma, and/or treated with anti-PD-(L)1 + anti-CTLA-4, and shorter in patients with RCC or in those patients with NSCLC who stopped treatment for toxicity onset. Funding: The Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN 2022Y7HHNW).

Indexed as

DiscontinuationImmune-checkpoint inhibitorsMeta-analysis melanomaNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID39007061
PMCPMC11245998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.