ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph and Geometric Deep Learning for Intracranial Aneurysm Geometry and Hemodynamics: A Systematic Review with Implications for Neurovascular Implant Design and Evaluation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Local pressure as a dominant hemodynamic driver of wall enhancement in anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a facet-level computational fluid dynamics and vessel wall imaging analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Digital Twins as the Implementation Layer of Precision Medicine in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Review
- Physics constrained graph neural network for real time prediction of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- From hemodynamic stress to inflammatory wall remodeling in intracranial aneurysms.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- A computational model of coronary arteries with in-stent restenosis coupling hemodynamics and pharmacokinetics with growth mechanics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in computational fluid dynamics continuously extend the comprehension of aneurysm growth and rupture, intending to assist physicians in devising effective treatment strategies. While most studies have first modelled intracranial aneurysm walls as fully rigid with a focus on understanding blood flow characteristics, some researchers further introduced Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) and reported notable haemodynamic alterations for a few aneurysm cases when considering wall compliance. In this work, we explore further this research direction by studying 101 intracranial sidewall aneurysms, emphasizing the differences between rigid and deformable-wall simulations. The proposed dataset along with simulation parameters are shared for the sake of reproducibility. A wide range of haemodynamic patterns has been statistically analyzed with a particular focus on the impact of the wall modelling choice. Notable deviations in flow characteristics and commonly employed risk indicators are reported, particularly with near-dome blood recirculations being significantly impacted by the pulsating dynamics of the walls. This leads to substantial fluctuations in the sac-averaged oscillatory shear index, ranging from -36% to +674% of the standard rigid-wall value. Going a step further, haemodynamics obtained when simulating a flow-diverter stent modelled in conjunction with FSI are showcased for the first time, revealing a 73% increase in systolic sac-average velocity for the compliant-wall setting compared to its rigid counterpart. This last finding demonstrates the decisive impact that FSI modelling can have in predicting treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.