ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2024
Comparative effect of skeletal stem cells versus bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on rotator cuff tendon-bone healing.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Highly bio-adapted hydrogels for tendon-bone interface regeneration: Natural healing inspiration, design strategies, and biomedical potential.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Stem cell approaches for tendon repair: delusion or insight.The Journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Total Flavonoids ofBiology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of hyaluronic acid and conditioned serum in acute rotator cuff tear repair: A rat model study.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025Article
- Bottom-up Biomaterial strategies for creating tailored stem cells in regenerative medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Understanding pathophysiology and injury mechanisms is the foundation for invention/innovation and clinical translation in orthopaedics.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have immense potential in applications for the enhancement of tendon-bone (T-B) healing. Recently, it has been well-reported that skeletal stem cells (SSCs) could induce bone and cartilage regeneration. Therefore, SSCs represent a promising choice for cell-based therapies to improve T-B healing. In this study, we aimed to compare the therapeutic potential of SSCs and BMSCs for tendon-bone healing. Methods: SSCs and BMSCs were isolated by flow cytometry, and their proliferation ability was measured by CCK-8 assay. The osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic gene expression in cells was detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). C57BL/6 mice underwent unilateral supraspinatus tendon detachment and repair, and the mice were then randomly allocated to 4 groups: control group (tendon-bone interface without any treatment), hydrogel group (administration of blank hydrogel into the tendon-bone interface), hydrogel + BMSCs group (administration of hydrogel with BMSCs into the tendon-bone interface), and hydrogel + SSCs group (administration of hydrogel with SSCs into the tendon-bone interface). Histological staining, Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) scanning, biomechanical testing, and qRT-PCR were performed to assay T-B healing at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. Results: SSCs showed more cell proportion, exhibited stronger multiplication capacity, and expressed higher osteogenic and chondrogenic markers and lower adipogenic markers than BMSCs. In vivo assay, the SSCs group showed a better-maturated interface which was characterized by richer chondrocytes and more proteoglycan deposition, as well as more newly formed bone at the healing site and increased mechanical properties when compared to other there groups. qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the healing interface in the SSCs group expressed more transcription factors essential for osteogenesis and chondrogenesis than the interfaces in the other groups. Conclusions: Overall, the results demonstrated the superior therapeutic potential of SSCs over BMSCs in tendon-bone healing. The translational potential of this article: This current study provides valuable insights that SSCs may be a more effective cell therapy for enhancing T-B healing compared to BMSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.