ArticleCureus2024
Cryptococcal Meningitis in an Immunocompetent Patient With Underlying Risk Factors.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryptococcal meningitis, a severe fungal infection of the central nervous system, is usually found in immunocompromised patients, especially those with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Its occurrence in immunocompetent individuals is rare and the presentation can be nonspecific. We present a case of cryptococcal meningitis in a young, immunocompetent male with a known history of intravenous drug abuse who was also found to have hepatitis C during admission. Induction therapy with amphotericin B and flucytosine was completed for 14 days. This shorter duration was considered as he had a good clinical response with rapid improvement in mental status and intracranial pressure with an extraventricular drain and negative repeat cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture. However, during the consolidation phase with fluconazole, the patient developed new neurologic symptoms and the induction phase had to be re-initiated for a total of 28 days. The patient likewise required the re-placement of an extraventricular drain and the creation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt due to persistent CSF accumulation and increased intracranial pressure. He was eventually discharged on fluconazole for a planned consolidation phase of eight weeks, followed by a prolonged maintenance phase, but the patient was lost to follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.