ArticleActa medica Philippina2024
The Effects of Induction Chemotherapy in the Management of Ultra High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of ultra high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients managed with and without induction chemotherapy in the Division of Trophoblastic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital. Methods: Clinical and demographic data were collected retrospectively from ultra high-risk GTN patients admitted in the Division of Trophoblastic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021. Rate of remission and early death of those who received induction chemotherapy were compared to those who did not. Results: A total of 21 patients with ultra high-risk GTN were included in the study, nine of whom underwent induction chemotherapy while 12 had no induction chemotherapy and was given the standard EMACO regimen. There was no significant difference in the rate of early death as well as the rate and time to achieve remission between those who received induction chemotherapy compared to those who were immediately started on EMACO.
conclusionA firm conclusion cannot be drawn from the results considering the small population included in the study. Further studies with larger sample size and prospective study design are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.