ArticleOncology letters2024
Temozolomide based treatment in glioblastoma: 6 vs. 12 months.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- BBB-aware stimuli-responsive and biomimetic nanomedicines for glioblastoma.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Review
- Integrated Transcriptomic and Single-Cell Analyses Identify HILPDA as a Hypoxia-Mediated Regulator of Ferroptotic Signaling in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Radiomics and comparative neuroimaging of canine gliomas and human glioblastomas: a step toward precision medicine.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Improving the Response of High-Grade Glioma (HGG) Cells to Temozolomide Treatment Through Combination With Imatinib.Cureus · 2025Article
- Establishment of U-87MG Cellular Fibrosis as a Novel in Vitro Model to Analyze Glioblastoma Cells' Sensitivity to Temozolomide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Stupp regimen remains the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastomas, although the prognosis remains poor. Several temozolomide alternative schedules have been studied, with extended adjuvant treatment (>6 cycles of temozolomide) frequently used, although different trials have indicated contrasting results. Survival data of 87 patients who received 6 ('6C' group) or 12 ('12C' group) cycles of temozolomide were collected between 2012 and 2022. A total of 45 patients were included in the 6C group and 42 patients were included in the 12C group. Data on isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status were also collected. The 12C group exhibited statistically significantly improved overall survival [OS; 22.8 vs. 17.5 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.73; P=0.001] and progression-free survival (15.3 vs. 9 months; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.62; P=0.001). However, in the subgroup analysis according to MGMT status, OS in the 12C group was significantly superior to OS in the 6C group only in the MGMT unmethylated tumors. The present data suggested that extended adjuvant temozolomide appeared to be more effective than the conventional six cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.