ArticleGlobal heart2024
Effectiveness of the Hypertension Screening Corner in Enhancing the Cascade of Care at Primary Healthcare Center Level: Evidence from Zambezia, Mozambique.
Article in Global heart, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: Burden, Barriers and Priorities for Improving Treatment Outcomes.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Barriers and facilitators to accessing Non-Communicable Disease services among children, adolescents and young people with Type 1 Diabetes in Mozambique: a quantitative content analysis using the COM-B framework.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease, whose death burden is dramatically increasing in sub-Saharan Africa. To curb its effects, early diagnosis and effective follow-up are essential. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of a hypertension screening corner on the hypertension care cascade at the primary healthcare level. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 in two PHCCs in Zambezia (Mozambique). The study involved a demographic and socioeconomic status (SES) questionnaire for those screened. Patients with blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mmHg were given a follow-up questionnaire regarding the care cascade. The four cascade steps were: medical visit, diagnosis confirmation, follow-up visit, and recalling the follow-up appointment. The odds ratio (OR) of reaching each step of the cascade was assessed by binomial logistic regression. Results: Patients with BP > 140/90 mmHg were 454, and 370 (86.0%) completed both study phases. Individuals attending the medical visit were 225 (60.8%). Those with low SES had a higher probability of visit attendance than those with middle (OR = 0.46, 0.95CI[0.23-0.88] p = 0.020) and high (OR = 0.21 0.95CI[0.10-0.42], p < 0.001). Hypertension diagnosis was confirmed in 181 (80.4%), with higher probability in the low SES group compared to the middle (OR = 0.24 IC95[0.08-0.66], p = 0.007) and high (OR = 0.23, IC95[0.07-0.74], p = 0.016) groups. The OR to complete step 1 and step 2 were higher for older age groups. A follow-up appointment was received and recalled by 166 (91.7%) and 162 (97.6%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: The hypertension corner proved to be a useful tool for effective screening of hypertension with satisfactory retention in care, especially for people with lower socio-economic status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.