Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006859›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2024

The Minimum 5-Year Follow up of a Highly Versatile Distally Anchored Femoral Revision System With Hydroxyapatite Coating.

James Shelton, ARCOS Study Collaborative, Andrew Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James SheltonSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Yorkshire, UK.
ARCOS Study Collaborative
Andrew GordonSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Yorkshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful operations medicine can offer. As more patients undergo total hip arthroplasty the revision burden increases proportionately. This is a cohort study of the Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System. Methods: The primary outcome was rerevision of the femoral component. Secondary outcomes include complications and radiological and clinical outcomes over 5 years. Results: A total of 74 patients were recruited, and the femoral survival rate was 100% at 5 years with 12 censorships. A total of 31 patients were given Proprosky 3/4 preoperatively. Eleven patients underwent further procedures; however, no femoral components were revised. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed by a biostatistician. Patients demonstrated a consistent and sustained improvement in Harris hip score, Oxford hip score, and EQ-5D. Radiological review revealed minimal and stable lysis around the femoral components. Conculsion: The ARCOS Modular Femoral Revision System was designed to offer a range of options to allow femoral bone stock preservation and avoiding conversion to an endoprosthetic and seems to be effective in the medium term.

Indexed as

FemurHipInfectionRevision

Identifiers

PMID39006859
PMCPMC11239970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.