Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006803›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

HAWKFOG-an enhanced deep learning framework for the Fog-IoT environment.

R Abirami, Poovammal E

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R AbiramiDepartment of Computing Technologies, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India.
Poovammal EDepartment of Computing Technologies, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac disease is considered as the one of the deadliest diseases that constantly increases the globe's mortality rate. Since a lot of expertise is required for an accurate prediction of heart disease, designing an intelligent predictive system for cardiac diseases remains to be complex and tricky. Internet of Things based health regulation systems are a relatively recent technology. In addition, novel Edge and Fog device concepts are presented to advance prediction results. However, the main problem with the current systems is that they are unable to meet the demands of effective diagnosis systems due to their poor prediction capabilities. To overcome this problem, this research proposes a novel framework called HAWKFOGS which innovatively integrates the deep learning for a practical diagnosis of cardiac problems using edge and fog computing devices. The current datasets were gathered from different subjects using IoT devices interfaced with the electrocardiography and blood pressure sensors. The data are then predicted as normal and abnormal using the Logistic Chaos based Harris Hawk Optimized Enhanced Gated Recurrent Neural Networks. The ablation experiments are carried out using IoT nodes interfaced with medical sensors and fog gateways based on Embedded Jetson Nano devices. The suggested algorithm's performance is measured. Additionally, Model Building Time is computed to validate the suggested model's response. Compared to the other algorithms, the suggested model yielded the best results in terms of accuracy (99.7%), precision (99.65%), recall (99.7%), specificity (99.7%). F1-score (99.69%) and used the least amount of Model Building Time (1.16 s) to predict cardiac diseases.

Indexed as

cardiac diseasesfog/edge computingHarris hawk optimizationinternet of thingsself attention mechanism

Identifiers

PMID39006803
PMCPMC11239548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.