ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024
Bringing online adaptive radiotherapy to a standard C-arm linac.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inverse-consistent deformable image registration to propagate biomechanical constraints for online adaptive radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Impact of CT calibration curves on radiotherapy planning using diagnostic CT scans and a planning CT supporting DirectDensity reconstruction.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Quality assurance of online adaptive radiotherapy workflows using film dosimetry in a 3D printed thorax anthropomorphic phantom.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Local rigidity constraints for deformable image registration in CBCT-guided radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Uncertainty estimation in female pelvic synthetic computed tomography generated from iterative reconstructed cone-beam computed tomography.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Current status and upcoming developments for online adaptive proton therapy enabling a closed feedback loop for near real-time adaptation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Development and comprehensive clinical validation of a deep neural network for radiation dose modelling to enhance magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- A systematic review of the role of artificial intelligence in automating computed tomography-based adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) workflows require dedicated equipment. Our aim was to develop and implement an oART workflow for a C-arm linac which can be performed using standard clinically available tools. A workflow was successfully developed and implemented. Three patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for bladder cancer were treated, with 33 of 35 total fractions being delivered with the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided oART workflow. Average oART fraction duration was 24 min from start of CBCT acquisition to end of beam on. This work shows how oART could be performed without dedicated equipment, broadening oART availability for application at existing treatment machines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.