ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Utero-Placental Perfusion Development From First to Second Trimester Between Low-Risk and High-Risk Pre-eclampsia Groups With Aspirin Prophylaxis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a common diagnosis in pregnancy and affects pregnancies worldwide. Early-onset PE often leads to severe maternal and fetal complications. Prophylactic use of aspirin (150 mg/day) before the 16th week of pregnancy can reduce the risk of PE. This study aimed to investigate the effects of maternal factors on the development of uteroplacental perfusion and fetal biometry from the first to the second trimester in a risk group receiving aspirin prophylaxis compared to a control group without Aspirin. Methods This case-control study included 448 women at high risk for PE (risk group, RG) receiving aspirin prophylaxis and 468 women at low PE risk without aspirin intake (control group, CG). Parameters recorded and considered in the first (T1) and second (T2) trimesters included uterine artery pulsatility multiple of the median (UtAPI MoM), notching at T1 and T2 and fetal biometry parameters at T2. Maternal factors were also captured, and their respective effects were examined. Results UtAPI MoM at T1 and T2 showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.39, p < 0.001), with UtAPI MoM at T2 significantly higher for notching "yes" at T1. Pre-existing arterial hypertension and UtAPI development demonstrated a significant association (p = 0.006). Women without this risk factor showed a significantly (p < 0.001) greater decline in UtAPI development. The likelihood of notching "yes" at T2 (p < 0.001; OR: 5.80) was increased with higher UtAPI MoM at T1. The mean values (T1 and T2) of UtAPI MoM were significantly higher in the risk group than in the control group. Patients in the risk group exhibited notching at T2 (p < 0.001; OR: 5.64) more often compared to the control group. The 95% CI of the estimated fetal weight for notching "yes" at T1 was below the 50th percentile. Gestational age and head circumference/abdomen circumference (HC/AC) ratio showed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001; b = -0.01). The control group showed significantly higher estimated fetal weights than the risk group. The HC/AC ratio in the risk group was above the HC/AC ratio in the control group but without proving significance. Conclusions Persistent notching and elevated UtAPI MoM levels in the second trimester may be risk factors for early-onset PE. Women with pre-existing arterial hypertension, notching and elevated UtAPI MoM values in the first and second trimesters require special monitoring during the course of pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.