Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39006674›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Beyond the Chair: Exploring the Boundaries of Teledentistry.

Medhavi Malpe, Sonali G Choudhari, Nikhilesh Nagtode, Pramita Muntode Gharde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Medhavi MalpeDepartment of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Sonali G ChoudhariDepartment of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Nikhilesh NagtodeDepartment of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Pramita Muntode GhardeDepartment of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teledentistry, a blend of dentistry and telecommunications used to provide dental care from a distance, holds great promise in enhancing public health, especially in reaching communities with limited access. However, putting it into practice has its own set of obstacles and background variables. It is frequently difficult to obtain dental treatment, especially in rural or economically underdeveloped areas. By removing geographical constraints and offering virtual consultations and diagnostics, teledentistry provides a solution. The quick development of technology, such as portable electronics and high-speed internet, has increased accessibility and efficiency in communication, which has aided in the acceptance of teledentistry. Getting traditional dental care can be costly, particularly for people without insurance. As an affordable substitute for traditional dental care, teledentistry may lower overhead expenses related to physical dental offices. Early interventions and preventive care can greatly enhance oral health results and lessen the need for later, more invasive procedures. There are disparities in the availability of digital gadgets and internet connectivity. The laws that control telehealth services might differ greatly between nations and areas. While teledentistry can help with remote consultations and triage, it might not be able to do thorough examinations or other diagnostic treatments that need in-person attendance. Delivering dependable, top-notch telemedicine services in developing areas can pose challenges. Certain dentists might hesitate to utilize teledentistry due to concerns about the quality of care, liability issues, or potential impacts on their traditional practice models. It could be difficult to get patients to accept and use teledentistry services. This review is undertaken to assess the effectiveness of teledentistry in public health as well as legal and regulatory considerations for practicing teledentistry. Teledentistry might be the future of the oral health sector, thus fully capitalizing on this enormous opportunity to change how oral therapies are administered. Patients, dentists, and the dental community at large will need to have highly open minds. For the community's well-being and to gain its trust, ethical considerations are crucial. The outcomes of teledentistry can be attained by overcoming the obstacles and using comprehensive methods and approaches. It was noted that teledentistry is a potential strategy that combines dental care with telecommunication technology to enhance patient outcomes, reduce healthcare inequalities, and expand access to oral health services. The delivery of oral healthcare is being revolutionized by teledentistry, especially in light of contemporary issues including geographic restrictions, lack of access to dental treatment, and the ongoing global health crisis.

Indexed as

dental clinichealth technologypublic health dentistryteleconsultationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39006674
PMCPMC11246187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.